Building Materials Stocks — Fair Value & Margin of Safety
Equity Rank covers 13 Building Materials companies; 11 have a published model fair value, and 6 of those (55%) trade below the model estimate. The median model fair value sits 6.1% above the current price, under these model assumptions. Data as of 2026-10-22.
Source: Equity Rank — Building Materials stocks. Model fair value is a multi-method blend (DCF, Graham Number, earnings power, sector multiples and more), recomputed after each U.S. market close.
Building Materials stocks furthest below the model estimate
Among companies valued by at least five methods. A wide gap can also mean the models are missing something.
CX — Cemex SAB de CV ADR: model fair value $14.68 vs. price $10.11, a model fair value differential of 45.2% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
TTAM — Titan America SA: model fair value $16.84 vs. price $13.77, a model fair value differential of 22.3% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
TGLS — Tecnoglass Inc: model fair value $47.30 vs. price $38.72, a model fair value differential of 22.2% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
CRH — CRH PLC: model fair value $100.60 vs. price $86.46, a model fair value differential of 16.4% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
AMRZ — Amrize Ltd: model fair value $44.85 vs. price $39.44, a model fair value differential of 13.7% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
KNF — Knife River Corporation: model fair value $57.12 vs. price $53.85, a model fair value differential of 6.1% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
Largest companies first. Gap = model fair value differential versus the current price; positive means the price sits below the model estimate. “Not published” means the models lacked reliable data.