Agricultural Inputs Stocks — Fair Value & Margin of Safety
Equity Rank covers 8 Agricultural Inputs companies; 7 have a published model fair value, and 6 of those (86%) trade below the model estimate. The median model fair value sits 35.3% above the current price, under these model assumptions. Data as of 2026-10-22.
Source: Equity Rank — Agricultural Inputs stocks. Model fair value is a multi-method blend (DCF, Graham Number, earnings power, sector multiples and more), recomputed after each U.S. market close.
Agricultural Inputs stocks furthest below the model estimate
Among companies valued by at least five methods. A wide gap can also mean the models are missing something.
NTR — Nutrien Ltd: model fair value $96.47 vs. price $69.09, a model fair value differential of 39.6% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
CF — CF Industries Holdings Inc: model fair value $163.88 vs. price $118.56, a model fair value differential of 38.2% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
UAN — CVR Partners LP: model fair value $169.47 vs. price $125.23, a model fair value differential of 35.3% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
CTVA — Corteva Inc: model fair value $15.50 vs. price $12.86, a model fair value differential of 20.5% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
IPI — Intrepid Potash Inc: model fair value $34.51 vs. price $30.77, a model fair value differential of 12.2% above the current price (as of 2026-10-22)
Largest companies first. Gap = model fair value differential versus the current price; positive means the price sits below the model estimate. “Not published” means the models lacked reliable data.